An interesting conversation over the last couple weeks over at WriterL: How two-sided should an "interview" be? How much should you give up, in other words, to get what you're looking for? Jon Franklin wrote: "I think there's a time and place to share personal information, but in my experience it's very uncommon. If I needed to do that, I'd worry that I didn't seem interested enough in the person I'm interviewing."
The responses have run the gamut.
From …
Jennie Phipps: "I think reporters often mistake an interview for a personal conversation in which two people share information."
To …
David Hayes: "Sometimes it's my contribution to the conversation that elicits an interesting response."
Jack Hart got on and recommended Creative Interviewing by Ken Metzler.
Anyway, what do you think here, Gangreyers?




Leave a comment
Posting subscribes you to the Gangrey newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.